Видео

So many stupid lies in this video.

If we pass our values to our children is indoctrination, if we pass your values it's enlightenment, you people are just plain criminals.

The title is misleading , the speakers are clearly not aware of contingent and other philosophical arguments , they just straw man theists position and call it God of Gaps. Right from the title which says something from nothing, and in the opening minutes they cry out it has to be something, why then fool the audience.

Religious came from nothing and still nothing only big lucrative business which does something for the con artist

I say for Mr Richard and Mr Krause that' something from nothing is where religious came from and ignorance exist and it came from nothing. to something negative like the addition to drugs and alcohol they are there but you can never get out of your system

Religious people say so because they don't want to accept science and religious proved a nice big lucrative business that makes everybody happy

What if the universe is infinite and that expansion and contraction are cyclical. There is no question of beginning or end.

Even though I don't hold to any of these people's world views, I still enjoy listening to them.

He cites his aching back as proof of evolution…. Cretin.

And what the fossil record shows is eons of time with no change punctuated by rapid speciation. Darwin has been falsified, neo-Darwinism completely obliterated by the impossible math. The random appearance of a single usable protein would take all the generations of all the creatures that lived on a trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion Earths. And human use an estimated 20,000 proteins. 20 new phylum, new body types, crustaceans, moliusks, chordates, appeared in a few million years in the Cambrian Explosion.

The supposed development of resistant bacteria is not an example of evolution. The resistant bacteria were there, in the population, all along. First the antibiotic kills the least resistant bacteria and next the surviving bacteria share their DNA so that the survivors take more and more resistant DNA. And besides, it is not speciation because the survivors are not a new species, so it is not macroevolution. Creationist have never denied microevolution, but all of these examples that evolutionists proffer are examples of microevolution. And not only were the dark moths in the population before wide coal buring, and a color change would only be microevolution, those kinds of moths did not hang out on the bark of trees. All of these stories are lies. Species stay the same for millions of years, millions of generations in the case of short lived species.

The observed fact that we have seasons has nothing to do with our revolving around the sun or the hypothetical possibility that the sun could revolve around the Earth. It has nothing to do with day and night. The Earth wobbles on its axis, facing the Nothern Hemisphere and then the Southern toward the sun. Although we do move closer and farther away from the Sun during our rotation, that's not what causes seasons.

Never meet your heroes😞

Do creationists come onto the comments these videos pontificating dogmas like the Atheists feel the urge to purport the dogmas pseudo-scientism on Discovery Institute videos… Does almost everyone accept that evolution occurs, yes… do people think evolution can explain the origins of lifeforms and then account for biological diversity… only mostly those that absolutely naively think the data actually supports their assumption one literally has to leverage the data to conform to a presumption. Yes, evolution is true… that is why “Consistency Indices and Random Dara” Klassen (1991) is cited 117 times in the literature pertaining to homoplasy phylogenetic and morphology analytics… So yes evolution is proven if you accept that the more taxa you add the consistency index decreases, resembling random data, rather than a morphology on a tree of life. Stoeckle & Thaler 2018 obliterates any mtDNA phylogenetic tress…. it absolutely refutes everything you state about speciation… why can you be such a dozy idiot citing size changes as speciation events… moron!

Im not a ape 🦍 nor a monkey 🐒 your mommy is !

And yet his evolution panelist buddy, Craig Venter(world leading geneticist), told him in no uncertain terms that Darwins theory was now defunct. In fact that exchange is even on camera. ruclips.net/video/xIHMnD2FDeY/видео.htmlsi=kIs7QfJZAn2H9yTY

What is a woman neil

What is a woman Neil

It is an absolute fool’s ambition to want to deter people from religion

Ohh you must come to india lol, criticise religion in any way, and you’re attacked from left right and centre stating ‘religious sentiment is hurt’.

This is absolute gold.

Its a very basic explanation but i do not think it removes the possibility of a natural population control. What causes homosexuality? No one knows. The field of genetics is vast in this day and age. Could it be enviromental factors causing genetic expression at an epigenetic level pushing individuals into the nonreproductive roles of child care to help reduce risk of overpopulation? Possibly. We don't really know what the purpose of homosexuality is. My opinion (note MY OPiNION) is that it serves some "purpose" for a species that is not clear. That is why it can be seen in multiple species not just humans. Is it naturally selected against in reproductive means? By the nature of it in a sense yes but that is natural selection not population control.

RIP Daniel and Richard. Thank you for carrying Darwins torch for all these years. Evolution is all around us. We all evolve as we age and we learn. Evolution seems as though it should be obvious. Its amazing that we can all overlook the obvious when we are bombarded with imaginary ideas. Darwin was a true scientist a followed the facts.

R.I.P Dennett.

The poetry of science relies in whole on the clear discernable design . This is the salient point and one can delusionally shout out into the cosmos design is an illusion( like dawkins) while they and all things seen dance like stringed puppets to the clear discernable design.

I am always skeptical when people, who do not believe in a higher intelligence than human intelligence, cannot explain consciousness ‘the hard problem’ Is it fundamental or what about mind,, does it emerge with quantum events? If what is believed, that the micro and macro elements created and evolved consciousness, and somehow mind evolved from that, a clearer picture of how exactly that was done would help. As what is elemental is just physical life, what is it that gave rise to it, or how did life arise prior? Atheism depends a lot on belief, it leaves a lot to the imagination. It is easier to go with consciousness being primary, and that mind is material and emerged with quantum events. That the elements gave rise to either is a bridge too far for rational thought to make sense of, much less condone.

The fool has said in his heart there is no God. These men really do sound like fools with how they are not thanking God for their life but rather thanking the universe which had to be created. May God have mercy on them both before it’s too late.

If someone is really secure in their beliefs, then someone (i.e. me) telling them it's made up mythology really shouldn't bother them. The only reason religious people get indignant is because they really know that it's indefensible bunk.

Creationist hypocrites continue to demand levels of evidence from those of us who are science minded that they have no possibility of equaling from their own creationist position. They have one standard of evidence for their own assertions and a different standard, one impossible to meet, for science. I have ONE standard of evidence and no claim from religious science denying fools has ever met that standard

Material science is not poetry it investigates matter, what is elemental. It knows zero about consciousness ‘the hard problem of consciousness’ is it fundamental and mind, does it emerge with quantum events? Very little about forces and nothing about magnetism. Darwinism should not be extrapolated to be the origin or the nature of reality, as it just makes us dumb and dumber. We have to keep our consciousness and intellects free from this reductiveness and stop gazing at our biological navels. We do have consciousness, we do have minds, we are also elemental or physical, triune not one-dimensional. It is time to end the extrapolation of the views of a mid-nineteenth biologist to encompass the nature of reality and consequently limit it. The great minds of the ages must be turning over in their graves.

In most cases, there is no way for the "people" to oust a bad representative...

Unfortunately, ... Representatives are not legally obligated to "represent" or "Reflect" The views of their constituents...

Hii dr AI हिन्दी (hindi) dubbed please Bharat (india) and pakistan 🇮🇳 Specially huge impact हिन्दी (hindi) dubbed Mr beast हिन्दी (hindi) dubbed video why should not dubbed video hindi My english so weak I am not easly understand especially america assent english please 🇮🇳🇮🇳

Hii dr AI हिन्दी (hindi) dubbed please Bharat (india) and pakistan 🇮🇳 Specially huge impact हिन्दी (hindi) dubbed Mr beast हिन्दी (hindi) dubbed video why should not dubbed video hindi My english so weak I am not easly understand especially america assent english please 🇮🇳🇮🇳

Hii dr AI हिन्दी (hindi) dubbed please Bharat (india) and pakistan 🇮🇳 Specially huge impact हिन्दी (hindi) dubbed Mr beast हिन्दी (hindi) dubbed video why should not dubbed video hindi My english so weak I am not easly understand especially america assent english please 🇮🇳🇮🇳

Hii dr AI हिन्दी (hindi) dubbed please Bharat (india) and pakistan 🇮🇳 Specially huge impact हिन्दी (hindi) dubbed Mr beast हिन्दी (hindi) dubbed video why should not dubbed video hindi My english so weak I am not easly understand especially america assent english please 🇮🇳🇮🇳

They will be alright.

We all just look down like, poor children. They will come to understand themselves one day. 🤷‍♂️

Were all farts of god lol.

😂 charitable correspondence

Prof. Dawkins caricatures classical theism in his book "The God Delusion." For example, he argues that God must be complex to create anything as complicated as the universe. I say that classical theists believe God is absolutely simple. They think he has no parts. Since any object needs a cause when that object has parts, the good professor's imaginary complex deity wouldn't be God. For classical thiests, God is the cause who makes each other object and event exist and enables it to cause what it causes. Since God is uncaused, he doesn't receive his existence. It's built in, if you will. Without God, there would be no universe since there would be nothingness. Dr. Hitchens astounded me when he debated Prof. William Lane Craig on whether God exists. Craig argued philosophically and scientifically. But his opponent didn't argue. Instead, he impressed the crowed with his eloquence. So, he seemed to ignore objections until he and Dr. Craig cross-examined each other. Would Hitchens have debated by reciting a poem by Tennison or Rilke? Dr. Harris says people don't have free will. If he believes that because he thinks our brains work deterministically, maybe he should conclude that deterministic events force me to believe I have free will. Supposing that deterministic event make him and me believe what we believe about free will, there will be no way to settle our disagreement. We'll have no may to tell who's right about free will, Dr. Harris or me.